To the Editor,
I have read the responses to President Obama’s executive order halting the deportation of undocumented people, particularly those who have lived here since childhood at no fault of their own. There seems to be two main factions who are against the order, 1) people who will find fault with anything the President does or 2) the over hyper-sensitive individuals who only see things in black or white on this issue and do not understand that there are multiple shades of gray. These two groups are not mutually exclusive.
Before someone responds, the country would have a new immigration policy, the Dream Act, from President Obama if the Republicans in Congress would have not prevented it from becoming law a long time ago. But Republicans stated at the beginning of 2009 that the one and only goal of their party was to make President Obama a one-term president and have blocked most of his legislative proposals for political gain. (When I hear that this executive order is only done for political gain, keep in mind opposing everything Democrats and the President has put forth just to elect more Republicans is the height of being political and to now whine about the President doing something political is the definition of hypocrisy). All President’s including Republican presidents, have used executive orders to bypass Congress and for political maneuvering.
But the problem President Obama seeks to change is, and please put yourself in this position in this scenario. You are an infant and are brought illegally to this country by your parents. You grow up here, attend school, English is your language, you grow up in the American culture and by the time you are 20 something you are as an American as if your parents came over on the Mayflower. You want to “serve” your country in the military defending freedom, you want to go to college to become a tax-paying productive individual but wait, you are technically illegal and is found out. You are deported to a country you know nothing about, do not know the language, do not know anyone. But because your parents brought you to America illegal as an infant you are in jeopardy of losing your home and the country you feel is every way yours. How would you feel? This is what the executive order is about.
Here is another example that relates to my ancestry. My grandfather came here from Germany as a young man. I do not know the story of how or even if he became naturalized. The system was much different then. I am assuming he was considered a citizen. Now what if I was born to parents who came here illegally from Germany after WWII and now after all this time find out that secret. Under existing laws, I could be deported to Germany. I don’t know anyone in Germany, I do not speak German but I am told not to come back to my home and my country because I am not technically American. Think about it.
The above scenarios depict just one problem with our existing laws. There are thousands of other issues regarding illegals. It is not just black or white where you could deport anyone just because they are not technical American. There are a multitude of gray areas. As the country waits for comprehensive immigration policies that help solve the problem, Republicans defiantly sit on their hands to score political points against the President and Democrats. What is great about our country is that we are a nation of compassionate people who understand the complexity of the situation and seek to find an equitable answer. At least that is the country I want to live in and aspire to. My hope is that the public eventually will reject the current climate of obstruction for true reform.
Comments
Submit a CommentPlease refresh the page to leave Comment.
Still seeing this message? Press Ctrl + F5 to do a "Hard Refresh".
Ellis Island, with the statue of liberty welcoming the tired and poor, was only open for about 30 or 40 years. Many people didn\'t come through Ellis Island. Many came before there were laws concerning immigration at all. Some were born here, and had their land taken from them only to be put on reservations. Many came in chains, quite legally, to our shame. Let me ask you, would you have broken a law to escape from slavery? I think it is important not to be too self righteous about our own citizenship. Frankly, most of us just lucked into it. And laws are man made. They can (and should, at times) be changed.
The President did turn his attention to immigration, long before this election cycle, with the Dream Act. And then he went on to a series of other issues he promised to address: health care, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. the economy, before returning once again to try a new approach to immigration. Is it the answer? I\'m not sure executive order was the way to go, but I do give him credit for trying a different approach when blocked by \" politics as usual.\"
Your argument of the immigration issue being gray rather than black or white is exactly the problem with the DREAM Act.
You can not have laws that are gray. Or in another word laws that are gray have loopholes. Laws can only be enforced with they are black and white. Right or Wrong. It would be impossible to be a law abiding citizen if you were unable to determine what was legal or illegal depending on who was going to judge them. It is the unfortunate side to this debate.
I can completely understand your feeling. I do not live in the Vinton area now, but was raised there. A few years ago a family in the town I live was deported. The children who were being sent back did not speak any Spanish and considered themselves to be US citizens. The community did their best to help the family stay. Yes, even I wanted them to stay. But the law was straight forward.
The Dream Act is also not fair to all illegal immigrants. The act allows illegals to stay if they were brought here before they were 16, have been in the country for at least 5 years and are less than 30 now. What about the 31 year old who has been here for 30 years, speaks no Spanish and has no relatives in Mexico? Or what about the 7 year old who has been here for 6 years and who\'s parents are over 30 and will be sent home leaving him here. Who will take care of him?
I am not saying we don\'t need a change to our immigration laws, but the laws we come up with need to be thought out, not put together quickly to help improve polling numbers.
One last problem to your argument. President Obama had a democratically controlled house and Senate for two years when he came into power. The Democrats had two years to come up with a solution to the immigration issue without the threat of a republican stonewall. Instead, they pushed through a stimulus bill that spent trillions of dollars with no impact to the economy and passed a health care law that looks to be overturned by the supreme court soon. Why did they choose to wait on immigration? They needed to prop up their base in the next election and an immigration bill in the first two years would have been forgotten about by now. Both the presidents stand on same-sex marriage and the immigration law are the true political points scored.