Dear Editor,
Today I received this piece online. I grew up in Vinton but no longer live in the area I don’t really want to add more ire, but I read your paper online and the editorial opinion submissions often. I just wanted to add this piece to those that are having those discussions about what is going on within our county’s current political struggles and media information and misinformation to the ongoing back and forth… just something for thought.
(Credits added at the bottom of the page) ·
Comments
Submit a CommentPlease refresh the page to leave Comment.
Still seeing this message? Press Ctrl + F5 to do a "Hard Refresh".
I lived and worked in the Middle East many years and fully agree with Mr. Kamena.
Matter of fact, I am a witness to more evidence of the “fake news”.
Congratulations Mr. Kamena.
I loudly applaud your thoughts...
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/feb/25/facebook-posts/no-california-mayor-did-not-write-column-explains-/
2017: He Fights
https://townhall.com/columnists/evansayet/2017/07/13/he-fights-n2354580
First off, although Dr. Marshall Kamena (an optometrist) did serve as the mayor of Livermore, California, from November 2001 to November 2011, he does not currently hold that office: that position is now occupied by John Marchand. (It’s also unlikely Dr. Kamena “ran as a Democrat,” as the application process for the office of mayor instructs candidates to submit “nonpartisan qualifying papers.”)
More important, though, is that Dr. Kamena is not the author of the article referenced above.
Now, to straighten things out. The happenings in Ferguson, Mo. was a sad situation. The death of the boy, the false reporting of those in the area at the time, the horrible rioting that went on for day after day, and what the whole situation did to that town. But, at no time did President Obama place blame on anyone, except for those rioting.
The author has several things wrong about the Benghazi nightmare. Yes, there was originally some blame put on a YouTube trailer that was translated into Arabic on September 11, 2012. Yes, the person responsible for that trailer, and the film that followed, was arrested. But, it was for violations his probation, and the improper use of an alias in the production of that film. He pleaded guilty and served a year in prison.
As far as the rest of Benghazi, the all Republican committee, headed by Trey Gowdy, found that Hillary Clinton had nothing to do with the tragedy. They found that the reason that Ambassador Stevens and the 3 others were not able to be rescued, was caused by a miscommunication issue between President Obama, The Office of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and The Secretary of Defense. That came straight out of Trey Gowdy's mouth, the day after they determined their findings.
As for the "Violent takeover of Universities", there has never been such a thing. The Kent State Massacre was because of a protest due the a U.S. bombing in Cambodia.
Now, the article says that without Abraham Lincoln, the Democrats might still have slaves. Sit down and let me educate you. It's no secret that the slaves were freed in 1864,and that the plantation owners in the South were predominantly Democrats. Fast forward around 100 years, or so. Our country had been going through a huge battle that you might've heard about called Civil Rights. It started around 1950,or so. By this time, the families of those plantation/slave owners from 100 years earlier, we're referee to as Southern Democrats, or Dixiecrats. Over the course of the 1940s through the 1950s, a funny thing happened in American politics. The Democrats, that used to be the conservative Party, became the liberal Party. The Republicans, that used to be the liberal party, became the conservative party. Now, the Dixiecrats didn't first catch on to this. It took them the better part of two decades, but eventually they all changed over to the Republican Party. So, the families of those former slave owners, we're then the newest Republicans. So, it wouldn't be the Democrats that still owned the slaves, if we hadn't had Abraham Lincoln. It would be the Republicans that owned those slaves.
Yet another HUGE mistake in that article. It made a reference to Hitler and Socialist. Talk about fake news. Ya see, Hitler was a con artist just like Trump is. Before he started his political career in Germany, he created his own political party. He called it "The German Socialist Workers Party". This wasn't because he was a Socialist, silly. It was to fool the German citizens into believing he was. And it worked. But, then after Chancellor Hindenburg passed away, and he became Chancellor, he started replacing members of his government with his friends from Austria, and the Nazi Party, his true party. Hitler WAS NEVER a Socialist! A Nazi and a Socialist are completely opposites.
Lastly, yes Hillary Clinton did do her Senior thesis on Alinsky. But, she was very critical of him in it. She wrote that his tactics were not applicable to the existing social environment.
As far as the claim of fake news and the Democratic Party being against American values. The whole text about this topic is in reverse. The fact is, the so called
You want us to believe the fake news is coming from CNN when it is coming from impeached 45 himself. He has made over 16,000 false or misleading claims and it is an everyday thing with him. I have never heard him say one thing to show any sympathy to the families who have lost loved ones in this epidemic. All he talks about is how wonderful he is.
Fighting without opposition is a really stupid statement. If anyone thinks the Democrats the Democrats haven't had opposition every step of the way they are pretty ignorant.
If any one thinks impeached 45 is fighting for America they need to pay attention to what he says. He constantly talks about himself and how every thing that he does and everything that happens reflects on him, how it makes him look. He tried to downplay the covid-19 numbers in the beginning so it wouldn't reflect bad on him. Everything revolves around him. He does not care about the United States or the people. Anyone who believes otherwise is delusional.
Norma Gould