Vinton-Shellsburg School Board President Pat Lyons is accused of committing several felony election violations and perjury in 2004, when he first ran for a seat on the school board.

V-S Superintendent Mary Jo Hainstock said Lyons submitted his resignation Monday night. He had called her earlier in the day to tell her about his legal situation.

Lyons, in 2004, according to a news release from the Vinton Police Department, was a convicted felon whose voting rights had not been restored. As such he was ineligible to vote or seek public office.

In 1996, Lyons was charged with stealing from his then-employer, Amerus Life between 1992 and 1996. The result of the case was a first degree theft conviction and the order to repay more than $180,000. Court records indicate that Lyons did repay that amount by 2006.

A 1996 article by the Des Moines register described Lyons as a "middle manager in the Springfield, Missouri market." Court Documents allege the thefts occurred from Oct. 21, 1992, to May 15, 1996.

In 2004, Lyons ran unopposed for the school board, and also voted in elections in March and September of that year, as well as in September 2005.

He has been charged with three counts of perjury of statement in connection with the voter registration and candidate affidavit forms, as well as three counts of election misconduct for allegedly casting votes while ineligible to do so. Lyons was eligible to vote when he ran for re-election in 2007 and 2010.

Lyons is the President of Ideal Industries of Vinton, and is also the registered agent on file with that company's corporation filings with the Iowa Secretary of State's Office.

Lyons turned himself in Monday at the Benton County Jail and was later released on a $5,000 bond. His initial appearance was set for tomorrow morning, 8:30 a.m. Thursday, April 20.

Resignation Letter

"It is with a heavy heart that I tender my resignation from the V-S Board of Education," wrote Lyons in his letter to Hainstock and the school board. "Recent events in my life will require significant attention and I do not wish for these to become a distraction to the important work and reputation of the board.

"This school district has provided wonderful opportunities in so many areas to three generations of my family. Best wishes and continued success as your work as stewards of our district's resources and our children's education. It has been an honor and a privilege serving with all of you."

Click to view Press Release.

Comments

Submit a Comment

Please refresh the page to leave Comment.

Still seeing this message? Press Ctrl + F5 to do a "Hard Refresh".

JH April 23, 2011, 11:55 am Kurt, Dean and Valerie:
First of all -- as I have learned decades ago -- in this business, the messenger tends to get killed more than the message. If people don\'t want to actually face the truth, it is simpler to blame the person telling them the truth.
Second, while I understand that it might be a technological nightmare to be able to screen out the gutless who won\'t sign their own names, I had a strong policy at the Eagle (the one I founded), that no letter ever appeared in the paper without a name and a phone number I could verify the comments with.
Finally, as for the matter at hand, I will abstain, other than to say this. Any matter pertaining to those who make policy involving our children needs to be transparent and above reproach. If due diligence was not done -- as it should have been --seven years ago, I am glad to see it is being done now. If it proves not to be a major issue, great. If not, at least the public knows all of the facts.
AH April 23, 2011, 11:19 am Kurt:
You can do everything right in journalism, but somebody will still find fault or not support you. As I tell my son, \"that\'s the way the ball bounces.\"

Hang in there and keep providing the public with straightfoward information.
JZ April 22, 2011, 6:27 pm Gotta laugh, at myself this time. Had no idea until Vinton Today politely pointed out to me that M.F. couldn\'t have written the (deleted) post because he is... dead. for a long time.
KK April 22, 2011, 10:32 pm Monkeytown created the idea of Vinton Today and one of my employees wrote the code that makes it possible. We \"loaned\" the code to the Eagle and shared in the advertising revenue. When the Eagle was sold we \"loaned\" the code to Dean and Val. From the very beginning we struggled with the Comments concept and still do. We can write strong authentication code, but then people say it\'s too cumbersome. We can do the OK Corral thing, like the Gazette does, and let everyone with a keyboard say whatever they like. We can write the code so Dean and Val have some control but things can still slip through. Share what you think because from a software/technology/shifting-journalism standpoint, this isn\'t easy. Meanwhile, back at the ranch, people I care about are suffering from whithering criticism, and the next person might be me.
JZ April 22, 2011, 4:22 pm Vinton Today re: Mark Fidrych
Are you guys a professional news organization or a wall for \"the meek\" to hide behind while they lob grenades? You put yourselves in a gray area when you publish letters signed by people who most likely have not written them. Although it is unlikely, the real Mark Fidrych could take legal action against you for publishing something with his name attached. Seriously.


AH April 22, 2011, 1:14 pm Can I add this to my previous comment:

Angie Holmes
Co-founder of the Vinton Eagle
AH April 22, 2011, 1:07 pm I agree that there is more to this story than is being told right now. Looking forward to finding out more.
S(H April 21, 2011, 7:48 pm I agree that it\'s responsible journalism to require names to be published on comments, and I hope that gets addressed.

I would also encourage readers to remember that \"innocent until proven guilty\" still stands here in the U.S., and until all the evidence has been presented and the verdict is reached, we don\'t actually know the \"facts\" of what happened. We know the charges, but we don\'t know the whole story. Nothing is certain or obvious yet.

I absolutely agree with holding people accountable for what they\'ve done. I don\'t agree with presuming that they\'ve done it before all the facts are in place.
DM April 21, 2011, 6:58 pm Pat Lyons paid for his transgressions in the 90\'s. He transformed his life and became a very valuable and respected member of our community. Given the fact that his status as a \"convicted felon\" was a well known fact in Vinton it doesn\'t seem reasonable that he was intentionaly violating the law when he voted. More
likely, he didn\'t think about it. Pat deserves a break in this matter and I hope he gets it. Just having that picture of him published is punishment enough.
JW April 21, 2011, 1:44 pm I firmly believe all comments and opinions (positive, negative or otherwise) need to pusblished with a legitimate author\'s name. Signing \"Jane Doe\" does not suffice. That\'s responsible journalism.
PM April 20, 2011, 5:38 pm Even though we all thought he was a good guy, he obviously thought he could pull one over on everyone, and he did, for a while. From other reports he didn\'t serve time for the first crime...just parole, when will someone say, \"Enough!\" We now know about this.
The notes that used to be here were only pointing out the facts, he didn\'t follow the law. Step back people, look at the facts, he broke the law...we used to punish people for doing that.
I April 19, 2011, 3:15 pm Great reporting, Vinton Today! Keep up the good work!
KS April 19, 2011, 10:45 pm Maybe committing a felony 15 or 20 years in the past is enough crime to keep Pat from voting. If he did pay back the funds he took, that took some doing and at least he did pay it back. It\'s too bad that a person can\'t get a decent break for turning his life around, and creating new business and serving on so many civic and local fronts. Maybe I\'m just naive, but Pat has been a client of my website business for several years, and he\'s always been good to me.
JZ April 20, 2011, 9:22 am Once again I would like to express my extreme displeasure with the practice of publishing comments without names attached to them. If people aren\'t comfortable going on record they should put a sock in it.
MD April 20, 2011, 10:59 am I do not think comments should be allowed on the site when people won\'t put their name to them.
KK April 20, 2011, 1:21 pm As someone who once suffered from the former CDVT publishing anonymous comments in the newspaper while I was on the school board, I feel strongly that is a very poor practice.